Fiscal Accountability Dilemma in Nigeria Public Sector: A Warning Model for Economic Retrogression

  • Home
  • ACCOUNTING
  • Fiscal Accountability Dilemma in Nigeria Public Sector: A Warning Model for Economic Retrogression

Fiscal Accountability Dilemma in Nigeria Public Sector: A Warning Model for Economic Retrogression

Abstract

The diagnostic survey conducted in 2001 into the Federal Government public procurement revealed that Nigeria lost several hundred billions of Naira over the last few decades due of flagrant abuse of procedures, lack of transparency and merit in the award of contracts in the public sector. Measures like legislative committees, financial audit, ministerial control, judicial reviews, anticorruption agencies, advisory committees, parliamentary questions and public hearing to ensure accountability in the public sector as in developed countries were adopted yet no tangible result has been achieved. This study investigated accountability in the Nigerian Public Sector. The population of the study is Nigeria public sector and the sample frames was drawn from Ministry of Finance, Presidency, Ministry of Works, and National Assembly. Source of data was primary and were collected through structured questionnaire which was distributed to 100 management staff of the above organizations at random. Data were analyzed using Pearson Product Moment Correlation with the aid of SPSS. The result showed that there is weak accountability in Nigeria due to weak accounting infrastructure, poor regulatory framework and attitude of government officials. It was recommended that the government, professional accounting bodies and citizens should work together to have a meaningful resolution on this issue as a matter of urgency

 

  • Introduction

Government exists to serve the needs of the citizens and ensure those needs are provided efficiently and effectively. It accomplishes these goals by providing clear processes and structures for all aspects of executive management (decision-making, strategic alignment, managerial control, supervision and accountability). Governance in both private and public arena has been a hot topic and now hotter due to various recent financial scandals. Citizens and regulators are calling for higher levels of transparency and accountability in all areas of business especially in public service. In a recent study, the World Bank found a significant relationship between good governance and high level of performance (Word Bank 1997). This generated the issue of using appropriate accounting method and today, many countries government are adopting accrual basis of accounting to improve governance and control which is a common practice in the private sector. Accountability is made possible when there is an established clear link between expenditures and performance. Accrual accounting helps agencies focus on outcomes and results rather than budgets and spending. Accountability is a concept in ethics and governance with several meanings and it is often used synonymously with such concepts as responsibility, answerability, blameworthiness, liability, and other terms associated with the expectation of account-giving. It stands out as a cherished goal of every civilized and well constituted government all over the world. Accountability is increasingly being used in political discourse and policy documents because it conveys an image of transparency and trustworthiness (Bovens, 2006) and its evocative powers make it indescribable. Government is entrusted with public funds and other resources, and must adhere to the highest ethical standards, honesty, integrity, propriety and objectivity to ensure optimum utilization. These goals can be achieved only through a combination of individual professionalism, personal standards and a rigorous control framework. Openness and transparency help instill public confidence and trust, and are increasingly considered basic operating requirements for any government

GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL HERE